Jurisdiction of Georgia Courts: Minimum Contacts Under Georgia Law - Part 2
I am a Fulton County personal injury lawyer, and I represent people who have been injured in car wrecks or by using a defective product, etc. I have been blogging about a legal concept called "jurisdiction". When a court has "jurisdiction" over a person, the court has legal authority over the person. In order to make that exercise of legal control fair, the person must have some "minimum contacts" with Georgia. In Georgia, a statute sets out six situations which will be considered "minimum contacts". The first three sections are the most important ones for most tort cases involving personal injury. In today's blog entry, I will be discussing the first two of these situations, and I will talk about the other four in my next blog entry.
(1) A Georgia court has jurisdiction over a nonresident who "[t]ransacts any business within this state." O.C.G.A. § 9-10-91(1). As a Cobb County premises liability lawyer, I might use this provision to explain to a court why it has jurisdiction over a slip-and-fall at Walmart, or an assault that occurs at a McDonald's here in Georgia. When I handle a Legionnaire's Disease case, I might cite to this statutory provision when I tell the Georgia court that it has jurisdiction over a hotel that failed to properly maintain its pool or whirlpool/spa. This provision used to be rather cut-and-dried, but it has become more and more interesting with the advent of the Internet. Companies in any state, or for that matter, in any part of the world, advertise via the Internet. A Georgia citizen may read the advertisement, and order a product or service. The company then sends the product into Georgia.
(2) A Georgia court also may exercise jurisdiction over a non-resident who "[c]ommits a tortious act or omission within this state, except as to a cause of action for defamation of character arising from the act." O.C.G.A. § 9-10-91(2). When I act as a Cherokee County nursing home malpractice lawyer, I might cite to this provision to explain why the Cherokee County court has authority over a national nursing home chain that failed to care for my client's much-loved parent. When I handle an Augusta car wreck case, I might use this section of the statute to explain why it is fair for the Richmond County court to exercise jurisdiction over a man from Maine who was driving on I-20 near Augusta when he crossed the road and hit my client. (Georgia also has a special provision to address non-resident motorists.)
The lawsuit (cause of action) has to "aris[e] from any of the acts, omissions, ownership, use, or possession enumerated in this Code section." In other words, the fact that the person had a Fayette County car accident does not give the Fayette County court jurisdiction over the person when it comes to a completely separate car wreck that the person had in Tennessee. The fact that an Alabama company ships a defective product into Spalding County, Georgia, does not give the Spalding County Court jurisdiction over a contract that the company made in Alabama with another Alabama company.




